0 comments

Memories of Prison and Raped Prisoners


By: Mojtaba Samiinejad

The practice of rape on prisoners, brought up by Karoubi in his letter to Rafsanjani, has existed for the last three decades in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Many prisoners have written about it in their memoirs, and rumors have always existed about the issue. Prisoner rape is one of the most horrific forms of human rights violations in Iran, but not much has been said about it until now, despite its widespread practice. Social stigmas have made people reluctant to discuss the issue, and an admission of the practice would have had grave implications for the Islamic Republic. However the taboo is broken now; Rafsanjani, the second most powerful figure of the regime, has now publicly been informed about rape in prisons. A door has been opened and the issue must now be discussed. I saw and heard about many rape cases during my prison term. With the issue now open for discussion, I want to retrieve from my memoires some of the stories and retell them, so we can better know who these rapists are.

What I saw in my own interrogators (of which there were more than ten) or heard from others proved to me the existence of sexual complexes among them for which I have no explanation. Maybe it is because of their profession or a result of the training they have received. Who knows? I just want to tell you about a few cases so that you know.

One. Perhaps you have heard about or remember the case of the bloggers in 2004. In a session with Ayatollah Shahroodi, the bloggers brought up the sexual nature of the questions asked of them in the course of their interrogations. The Ayatollah was so tormented by their trzendani siasieatment that he dropped all the charges against them. At the time when the bloggers were telling the head of the judiciary about their ordeals, I was in solitary confinement and was subjected to a similar line of questioning by my interrogators. The terms “coke bottle” and “baton” were constantly used by my interrogators, who were threatening to use these objects on me, but this was not important to me. What hurt me the most during that time was when they were questioning me about my sexual relationships with girls who were my classmates or coworkers. I was also questioned about my friends’ sexual relationships. This happened repeatedly during the long course of my interrogations.

Two. The interrogation unit of ward 352 of the IRGC prison consisted of 6 rooms. The rooms were located at the end of a short hallway that was used for recreation. Some nights all 6 rooms were occupied and other prisoners were being interrogated in them. Often one could hear their screams and cries, which mounted to the sky while they were being tortured (I say this for the attention of those who bring the prisoners to the court and tell them not to talk about torture). Some nights there were 6 bloggers in 6 interrogation rooms and we could hear the loud voices of the interrogators and the agonizing screams of our friends (during the first 40 days I was in solitary confinement, 20 other bloggers were brought in). Two of the bloggers were friends and had been arrested together. I will not name them since some people might recognize them. They were beating both of them to make them confess to having a sexual relationship with each other. One was asked if he was sexually involved with his friend’s girlfriend, and the other one was asked if he had ever had sex with two girls at the same time. This line of questioning had put extreme psychological pressure on both of them. As I was listening to their interrogations and beatings, I was frozen. I couldn’t even imagine what they were going through.

Three. One of the two friends (whom I will call A) was in a cell next to mine for almost 2 months. At night, when the guards were not around, we used to talk to other prisoners through the small hatch on the cell door. One night at about 3am I heard his cell door opened. I thought they had come to take him for interrogation (most of the interrogations took place at the early hours of the morning). I could hear A talk to the guard but could not completely figure out the content of their conversation, and, once in while, I could hear him begging. This went on for half an hour. A common system in the prison was to knock on the adjacent wall 3 times to call each other. When the other prisoner heard the knocking, he would go to the door hatch to talk. For the next 2 day I kept knocking on the wall but A did not answer. After 2 days he knocked on the wall himself. When he told me what had happened I was frozen. The guard had entered the room, had lowered his pants without any shame or concern and had asked him to… The more I think about this, the less I understand it. I realized that the guard had done it several time before. The days that particular guard was on duty, A never called the guards to go to the washroom. This went on as long as A was in the cell next to mine. One day when two officials (I do not recall from where) were visiting I told them about A’s case. They said they would look into the matter but nothing happened.

Four. 6 months later I was exiled to Ghezel Hessar prison in a ward where they kept Afghan murder convicts. Afghan prisoners were treated badly because they did not have anybody outside who could follow up on their cases or rights. One day at about 7 o’clock in the morning we all woke up with the sound of moaning and crying coming from the guards’ quarters. We were told that one of the Afghan inmates in our room had a dispute with one of the guards and had been taken away 20 minutes ago. I suggested that the head of our room should go and see what was happening. He left and when he came back he was not able to talk. He said that the Afghan inmate had been penetrated by a baton. I could not feel my legs anymore and had to sit down. I could not believe what I was hearing had actually happened. An hour later, other inmates brought Mostafa R (the Afghan inmate taken away) back to the room. His pants were bloody. He went to take a shower. While he was away I wrote a complaint letter about the guards to the warden of the prison. When Mostafa came back from his shower I asked him to sign the letter and he did. We sent the letter to the warden, and half an hour later they came back for Mostafa and took him to the office. He came back in the afternoon with some juice, cake and money in his hand. I was still watching him with astonishment when my name was called. The guard on duty and the warden were waiting for me. The warden said I should not put my nose in other inmates’ business. The guard began to threaten me and we got into an argument. I said they had to follow up on the complaint. They answered “what complaint” and showed me a letter that was signed by Mostafa saying he had made no complaint against anyone and no harm had been done to him. They obviously had played the old carrots and sticks tactics on him.

Five. Prisoners under the age of 20 are often raped by other inmates who are physically stronger than them. Prison authorities never investigate these cases and do not take them seriously. If I were to write all my memories of such cases I would have to write about many cases. What you just read in this article are only a few examples of what I saw. In my two years of imprisonment, I witnessed and heard about hundreds of cases of rape. I will write about them gradually in the future
read more
0 comments

Republican on Ashraf atrocity

read more
0 comments

Mousavi: accidental hero of Iran's opposition

By Alistair Lyon, Special Correspondent

BEIRUT (Reuters) - Mirhossein Mousavi's credentials as a loyal servant of Iran's revolution may help explain why he has escaped arrest for leading protests against an election he says was stolen to keep President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power.

The 68-year-old moderate politician is an unlikely hero for Iranian voters who switched from euphoric anticipation that he might win the June 12 poll to disbelief and anger when his fiery opponent was abruptly declared victorious by a wide margin.

Ahmadinejad will be sworn in by parliament on Wednesday, when the Revolutionary Guards and Basij militiamen will likely seek to foil any repeat of the post-election street unrest in which at least 20 people were killed and hundreds were detained.

Mousavi may lack charisma, but not courage. He has castigated the authorities for their handling of the election and its tumultuous aftermath. He has even defied his relative, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who overtly backed Ahmadinejad.

"Mousavi became a national hero by default," said Mehrzad Boroujerdi, an Iran scholar at New York's Syracuse University.

"What has endeared him to the public is the fact that contrary to former President (Mohammad) Khatami, who would be reluctant to stand up to Khamanei and others, Mousavi has stuck to his guns," Boroujerdi said. "In the process he has forced many cautious leaders to come out in support of the movement."

Mousavi has previously demanded the elections be annulled, but may need a new goal once Ahmadinejad is reinstalled.

"The plan should be to call into question the legitimacy of Ahmadinejad's administration at every turn, through civil disobedience, and also to press for some revisions to the constitution," Boroujerdi suggested.

Farideh Farhi, an Iran specialist at the University of Hawaii, said defiance had been Mousavi's main card so far.

"Given the extent of popular mobilization, he simply cannot back down at this point and he has not done so," she said.

"His tactic of shifting the focus to the violence that has ensued since the election and systematic violation of the law by the security forces is his only way of ... supporting the protesters and making sure they know he is with them."

ALLIES ON TRIAL

Mousavi has yet to unveil a promised new political front with his reformist and pragmatist allies, perhaps partly because so many leading figures are in jail, including 100 whose trial for inciting unrest began on Saturday and resumes on Thursday.

Prime minister during Iran's 1980-88 war with Iraq, Mousavi was active in the 1979 Islamic revolution that toppled the Shah and continues to proclaim his fidelity to revolutionary ideals.

During his election campaign he wooed conservative voters by urging a return to the "fundamental values" of the Islamic Republic's founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

Since the disputed vote, Mousavi has enjoyed vocal support from Khatami and reformist candidate Mehdi Karoubi, as well as the tacit backing of former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani.

His opponents undeniably control the means of coercion, but the tumult after the election has alienated some conservatives and even opened up rifts among Ahmadinejad's hardline allies.

Mousavi has not challenged Iran's system of clerical rule, even if many who support him may be chafing for broader change.

Grey-haired, bearded and bespectacled, Mousavi has the air of a calm intellectual. At the height of the street protests, he greeted the hundreds of thousands who turned out for him, but never sought to fire them up for fiercer confrontations.

Now he is one of several leaders in a broad-based movement that has largely avoided energy-sapping internal conflicts that might divert its momentum in the struggle with the authorities.

Iranian hardliners accuse Mousavi and his allies of working with foreign enemies, especially the United States and Britain, to instigate a "velvet revolution" against Islamic rule.

At least for now, the opposition seems set not on toppling the system, but on trying to make it responsive and accountable, an effort framed by Mousavi and others in revolutionary ideals.

"The situation has gone beyond the demands of one man or the leadership of one man," Farhi said. "Systemic change is something that is down the road and very much reliant on the continuation and expansion of popular mobilization."

Mousavi offered no detailed political or economic program during his election campaign, in which his wife Zahra Rahnavard played a striking role. But he promised a more open cultural atmosphere and an effort to reduce foreign policy tensions.

"He is giving the impression that he is a principled man genuinely outraged by what has happened to Iran," Farhi said, adding that he had no real choice but to stand firm or risk losing legitimacy in the eyes of those protesting for him.

Viewed as a traitor by hardliners, Mousavi had shunned politics for two decades before his run for the presidency thrust him into the unaccustomed role of opposition symbol.

"He is driven by his rock-solid revolutionary convictions, his antipathy for Ayatollah Khamenei, and his moral debt to those who voted for him and those who lost their lives in the post-election milieu," Syracuse's
read more
0 comments

From a besieged camp

Iranian left vulnerable as U.S. withdraws

By Mohammad Mohaddes
Washington Times


CAMP ASHRAF, Iraq.

I've lived in a state-controlled country, in which one is careful what one says for fear of "disappearing."

I've lived in a free country, going to school, being able to study what I want and say what I want -- with no fear of reprisal.

And I've lived in freedom in a sort of state of suspended animation -- free to do what I want and say what I want, but wondering how long that freedom would last.

Now, I am a hostage within that state, no longer feeling free. I am what the newspapers label an Iranian dissident; that means I have no use for the mullahs who rule my country and I want to see a thriving democracy where now there is a theocracy that spreads fear and terror around the world.

The first place I lived was Iran, a repressive society dominated by the mullahs who have perpetuated the rule established by the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini after the 1979 revolution that overthrew the shah.

Then, I went to the United States to study. But I longed to go back to help my country re-establish its place in the world as a beacon of freedom.

I knew, however, that I couldn't do that within present-day Iran. There, I knew I would be persecuted and face imprisonment or death if I dared to speak my mind. So I went to Iraq to join other Iranian exiles and work for the day that I could return home to a free Iran.

Now, I am a resident of Ashraf, a self-contained city about 60 miles north of Baghdad. It was built by my relatives and friends, all members of the People's Mujaheedin of Iran (PMOI), and it has a population of about 3,400. We have lived in peace here since coming to Iraq in 1986.

We have turned the desert into an oasis. We have constructed roads and buildings; a mosque, a university, a zoo, a park, stores and a shopping center; educational, social and sports facilities; swimming pools, and, yes, a cemetery. Sadly, that facility has been needed more than usual recently.
read more
0 comments

Democracy and role of women in leadership - Iranian Resistance Leader




Article sent by S.Chitsaz
Women's Commission of the NCRI


On the occasion of the International Women's Day, March 8, Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, president-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, underlined the importance of women's role in political leadership to fight fundamentalism and why they guarantee democracy for Iran's future. The following is the second and final part of her message:

The capacity for democratic change

The Iranian Resistance has the necessary political and social capacity to realize democratic change in Iran. It relies on a vast popular base, a capable force near the Iranian frontier, an organizational structure and a legitimate and progressive ideal. But the spirit that transforms these underlying potentials into reality is women's leadership.

Because they have been historically exploited and suppressed, women possess an enormous motivation and high perseverance in the struggle in order to make up for their lag. In the confrontation with the mullahs, we realized that women resemble a compressed spring that when released from the shackles of discrimination and faced with responsibility, they take giant leaps forward. The extensive presence of women in the anti-monarchic revolution in 1979, their heroic role in the confrontation with the clerical dictatorship, including their astounding resistance to torture in the regime's prisons, and the invaluable role they have played in the organized Resistance, prove that women are the growing force of our times. This growing force of women in the Resistance inspires women in Iranian society on a large scale to aspire to democratic change and transforms them into a major force to liberate Iran. Thus, it is the fundamental pillar of the Iranian Resistance's power.

Women's active participation in leadership also turns men into a force for change. It means eliminating exploitative thinking. For this reason, men who have become alienated due to the male-dominated culture, attain their human identity. This is a development that is a true awakening and cultural change that leads to liberated human energies.

On the surface it appears as though that when men accept women's leadership, they become pacified and take a back seat because they have lost their hegemony.

But the experience of the Iranian Resistance demonstrates that when men choose this path consciously, their sense of responsibility increases much more than when they were in charge. This is so because they have been liberated from the inhumane thinking and culture that has acted as an obstacle to progress and creativity.


Guarantee for democracy

The other important question is how does the decisive role of women guarantee democracy?

Creating democratic capacity in a government that would replace this regime is only possible with the active and equal participation of women in political leadership. Limitations and obstacles to women attaining a political role, not only denies them their democratic rights, but also undermines democracy. For in its most basic definition, democracy rests on human rights. Democracy does not mean political rights for male citizens only and it should not in any way be discriminatory in its application. When half of society cannot share power, democracy would also be lacking and fragile in the other half.

This reality sheds light on the state of all societies across the world today as it shows that the extent of women participation in political leadership of any society is the litmus test of the progress of democracy. When the issue of women sharing in and particularly leading, the political process is raised, despotic set of relationships that rely on the male-dominated culture will be forced into retreat.

Women's participation in leadership is a new perspective and approach that is based on empowering others instead of eliminating and humiliating them. It means accentuating positive attributes and strengths in others rather than highlighting their weakness and negative points. It means loving others instead of resenting them; team work as opposed to individual work. These are all the necessary elements of democracy and a political life based on understanding.


The vital role of women leadership in economic progress

Women's presence in political leadership plays a vital role in economic development. Today, giving more power to women is described as the "engine of development." Development programs in recent decades have had a downward spiral in many areas. They have not only failed to have any success in improving the general state of society, but have also exacerbated poverty in underdeveloped countries. Of course, women have been the victim of poverty everywhere. According to United Nations officials, today only one percent of the world's revenues belong to women. Such standards as transparency and accountability among government officials as well as the efficiency of government services have plummeted. Instead, violence, corruption and lawlessness have dramatically increased.

The reality is that in the current circumstances, where the balance of power does not favor women in different societies, development is advanced by relying on a worldview of despotism, corruption and anti-environmental policies of wasting human and material resources. The way out of this impasse is to recognize the role women could play. Because it not only combines women's tremendous force with the force for progress, but sweeps away barriers and obstacles to such progress, namely the male-dominated culture.

Gender equality as a human right was at the heart of the United Nations' development plan for the third millennium. The platform stresses, "Having an equal voice in political decision-making, from the family to the highest government levels, is a key element to empower women."

In the 1990s, some of the greatest world economists took a step forward in saying that economic development requires freedom. They also stated that "from the point of view of political economy, no issue is more important that recognizing the need for women's political, economic and social participation and their leadership."


The experience of the Iranian Resistance

My point about the impact of women's active and equal participation is not simply a theoretical appraisal of the current situation. It is a reality we realized and came to espouse in our confrontation with the ruling mullahs.

In the struggle to bring down the ruling theocracy, our movement realized that it was impossible to cast aside the obstacles to achieving democracy and freedom with the same tired and old motivations of past campaigns in past centuries. The political and international situation had created such limitations that not only the movement's advancement, but preserving its survival required a tougher and more costly struggle. Our movement recognized that it had to elevate its ideals, and thinking. Thus, it found the role of women in leadership as an imperative to democratic change in Iran. This became the source of a major cultural change in the ranks of our Resistance. If I were to offer a brief report on this process, it would simply be a recounting of the history of women's progress and their accepting key positions of responsibility. Indeed, this marked an escalation in our struggle with the religious dictatorship and the fundamentalists ruling Iran.

From the onset of this change, we came across several crucial junctures. Each time we had to make a definitive choice: either let go of the ideal of freedom and democracy and liberation of the Iranian people, or sacrifice even more and take up the challenge before us more vigorously to preserve the movement and advance its goals.

And every time, we realized that meeting that challenge required the decisive role of women. In other words, the ultimate logic for internal change in the ranks of the movement 20 years ago, which evolved step by step, was that achieving democracy and freedom could only be facilitated with the participation of women in leadership.

The reason was that we were facing an Islamic fundamentalist regime that rests on misogyny. Thus, the force that could defeat it had to be devoid of misogyny.

Contemporary political and economic processes confirm this reality. In the face of outdated solutions, the qualitative role of women offers a new solution. Thus, when it comes to the three options I mentioned earlier about the Iran crisis, we are not condemned to choose between appeasement and war. These two choices are ultimately of the same quality. They have a common substance and represent choices determined by the already-existing models, models that could only be realized through force and violence and by destroying enormous possibilities and resources. But they are alien to humanity's endless spiritual capabilities, and incapable in the face of obstacles to humanity's progress. When we realize the fallacy of this thinking, we recognize that the impasse that forces us to choose between the status quo and war is not genuine. Accepting appeasement or war is to surrender to inevitabilities. The real solution is the democratic and humane solution which is the by-product of active participation of women in the leadership of this movement and in running the affairs of Iran's future society.


Women's leadership is the source of the Resistance's power and cohesiveness

Now, we want to see how the role of women in the Iranian Resistance was tested and how it faired under difficult circumstances. You have heard reports about attacks and conspiracies in recent years against the Iranian Resistance. But many are unaware as to how the Resistance endured these difficulties.

The bases of the Iranian Resistance along the Iran-Iraq frontier were bombed during the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. This was despite the fact that the Resistance had declared neutrality in the conflict. The mullahs demanded and conspired to ensure the bombing of the Mojahedin by the US and Britain. The Resistance forces were also attacked and ravaged by the regime's agents. The mullahs then set in motion an expensive and major plan to destroy the Resistance movement. Ashraf City, the Mojahedin's main base, was surrounded and put under tremendous pressure. Under such circumstances, women in the leadership of the movement had to thwart the conspiracies and remain focused on its struggle against the regime. They had to preserve the organization under their command and advance the movement.

I have repeatedly lauded the role of pioneering women in Ashraf City, because I could see that they took charge of the leadership of the movement at the time when they seemed to have no prospects for success. The balance of power in Iraq and in the region did not favor the Resistance movement. They had nothing going in their favor, yet they led the movement in an extremely volatile situation without any prior experience.

They took responsibility and persevered in all stages of this struggle through vigilance, a clear vision, correct decisions, risk taking and sacrifice. The leadership of women that was tested in Ashraf City was nothing short of a courageous and spirited journey into the heart of difficulties and hardships.

The men in the movement, who had attained dramatic achievements in the course of the struggle against the male-dominated culture, played a crucial part in this perseverance and carried out their responsibilities alongside the women.


Emerging Capabilities and the Human Jem

The rise of women to leadership positions in the Iranian Resistance movement was of course a difficult feat. Once it was accomplished, however, its further development led to a recognition and discovery of new potential in every single member of the Resistance, especially in female members. They went through a process of dramatic change in which passivity and evasion of responsibility gave way to the formation of a resolute and independent temperament and personality.
The exemplary traits they showed were:
- Patience in the face of hardship and unforeseeable situations,
- No distress over personal mistakes or setbacks and the desire to learn from mistakes,
- Acceptance of unconditional responsibility. Their acceptance of responsibility was not limited and they were not intimidated by it. They willingly and eagerly accepted all the risks and consequences,
- Acceptance of the worst case scenario instilled in them a great degree of power and capability,
- Belief in that any hardship or complex problem has a solution. The enemy wishes to portray everything as impossible, all doors as closed, and you as weak and incapable. This is why their enemy, the ruling mullahs in Iran, is terrified of them.
- When differing points of view arise, it is of prime importance for them to avoid knee-jerk reactions, and instead, to identify the problems and arrive at a solution.
They have achieved a high degree of humanity and moral fiber such that when faced with the most negative behavior or comments from their fellow sisters, friends, or colleagues, they maintain self-restraint and avoid reacting negatively. Instead of giving importance to another person's negative characteristics or behavior, they show patience and tolerance so they may identify the root causes of issues, that when left unresolved, create problems in a team environment and lead to friction and disputes.
This represents a long step forward in the development of social relations and if it is transformed into general behavior, a vast and new world of human harmony and solidarity will develop. Fortunately, this trait has also developed among the men of this movement as well.
- The women of this movement have strengthened their compassion for their own sisters. In their daily work, before all else, they think about how they can help a growing number of their sisters to overcome the complex problems of performing solemn and important duties.
They have been able to organize a harmonious and united community of women to tackle the most difficult responsibilities in any field, because they have espoused these values. This is truly a new phenomenon in the evolution of social relations. This is a phenomenon that is necessary for the development of democracy and growth in every society, even the most advanced. The reason is that the core issue of all social development is the inherent conflict between the interests of the individual and the interests of society. This is an issue that has no set formula or standardized solution. In every individual case, one must determine which one should give way to the other.
The women of this resistance movement have learned by experience that in each collaborative effort, the correct method of problem-resolution is to give priority to the interests of their sisters as opposed to their own. In this way that woman can participate in the decision-making process at all levels of society.
- Indeed, they believe deeply in liberation and aspire to their people's prosperity and freedom, and strive to build a new phase in the history of their country.



Progressive Ideals

What is meant by women's active and equal participation in leadership?
In addition to achieving new management roles, this also means a change in male-dominated viewpoints, work habits, and cultural values and their replacement with new human values.

To address this issue, I raised earlier the Iran crisis that is a very critical issue in the world today, to show the profound difference between the various solutions that are presented for dealing with it. On the one hand, all proposed solutions, whether based on conciliation and appeasement, or on war and foreign intervention, seem to lead to an impasse and a gloomy outlook, as if no other option exists. That is to say, if we do not accept the status quo - despotic, regressive and barbaric fundamentalism - then we will have no choice but war. We reject this fait accompli. We have not and will not accept being confined to prevalent modes of problem-resolution that offer no hope for human liberty. Proposals and strategies that stem from exploitative thinking cannot offer a way out of this crisis. The mindset that stems from women leadership, however, rests on human resources and has an endless vision before it.

The leadership we are referring to is the result of a matured human development that rests on humane relationships. This is a major rebellion against male-dominated society and a regressive culture that should be negated.

This is why when women took responsibility of leadership positions in the Resistance movement, this change was not a mere change of managerial posts for us. The goal was rather to eliminate gender discrimination. It was not as if men left their posts so women could occupy them and manage the same set of relationships with the same methods. It was not as if women walked in the footsteps of their male predecessors or became part of a male leadership club, not at all. The main issue was casting aside the outdated relationships based on a male-dominated culture and replacing them with humane relationships.

Women's leadership in our movement did not eliminate or pacify men. On the contrary, it helped them free themselves of the burden of male-dominated culture that had shaped their thinking, will and affections. They shared their experiences with women and learned a great deal from the women who offered a new vision.

Thus, this is how we look at women leadership: As a progressive human ideal


Definitive defeat of Islamic fundamentalism


How could Islamic fundamentalism and misogyny be defeated? How could one prevent the death of democracy in countries under the influence of Islamic Fundamentalism?

The answer is this: You have to eliminate the male-dominated culture as an inhumane culture, through women leadership.

Accordingly, the establishment of democracy without the active role of women in society's leadership is impossible or at best retractable.

And this is how we respond to the Iranian regime which by exporting Islamic fundamentalism and trying to arm itself with nuclear weapons is threatening humanity.

In today's discussion, I referred to the threat of Islamic fundamentalism, which has alarmed all human beings. But when I think of the ideal of equality and the struggle we are vigorously pursuing, I am hopeful. A realistic hope that we can turn today's gloom into a bright future. We can tear asunder the shackles and attain emancipation and freedom.

Although considered as nothing, women must become everything. Fundamental changes in women are not a simple dream. Neither is the hope for the freedom of humankind. The only conceivable solution for emancipation is liberation based on a theory where human beings consider other human beings as the most exalted and thus adhere to the ideal of equality. This is the vision before us and I am sure we will triumph.
read more
0 comments

Women In The French Resistance

by Rebecca G. Halbreich

On 15 May 1945, Mathilde Gabriel Péri, one of the first women to have the honor of being seated at the Palais Bourbon, which until then had been reserved for men, declared: "If, in this national struggle, we earned something, we earned lucidity a nd when I say "we" - I mean women. Looming up from this chaos is a new woman."[1] This "new woman," a politicized, enfranchised woman, rose out of experiences in the Second World War, experiences which proved to be pivotal in the history of French women . Women made the progression from having a limited political voice before the war [2] to constituting "5.4% of Deputies elected [to the National Assembly] and 3.6% of Senators"[3] in 1946; a transition in large part based directly on their activities in the French Resistance Movement during the war. Lucie Aubrac, "the only woman at the Consultative Assembly at Algiers, and thus, the first French woman parliamentarian, noted that the 'profound mutation in the thinking and motivations' of women, engendere d by their Resistance experience, was an irreversible gain."[4] It is important to examine the motivations of some of these women, as well as their actual activities in the Resistance, in order to track their political development.

As leader of the Vichy Regime, Philippe Pétain initiated a vision of a new moral order for France, firmly based in a traditional structuring of society. It would be the antithesis of the materialism and individualism which he felt had characterize d Republican France, and had led to national catastrophe. As a large part of this vision, under its "femme au foyer" (woman at home) imperative, the government attempted to institutionalize a paternalistic and reactionary definition of the roles and stat us of women within the family and within French society. This definition of women centered on motherhood and femininity, and found expression "in a wide range of antifeminist policies in education, employment and sexuality."[5]

Under the "femme au foyer", motherhood became a national focus, and a sacred duty for women. While this demographic obsession was not new for France, the birthrate having been well behind that of other industrializing countries in Europe for more than a century, the authoritarian nature of the campaign was clear:

Early in the autumn of 1940 measures were enacted to prevent married women from going out to work. On 07 July, a few days before the existence of the Vichy regime, the government of Pétain told prefects to encourage local businesses to sack their women workers who were married to demobilized soldiers, and this was done even where the husband was unemployed and the family was dependent on the wife's wages. This began a pattern of increased discrimination in the workplace against all women, and the ir wages for equal work were pegged further than ever behind that of men, while in education, examiners were told to pass fewer girls than boys at the baccalaureate.[6]

These actions were inspired by the "Three K's" of Hitler's doctrine, (initials of the German words confining women to maternity, the kitchen and the church) and it was in this context that vast numbers of French women resisted first the Vichy, and later, the Nazi regimes.

How widespread resistance was in France has been widely discussed. Historian Robert Paxton contends that the number of active Resistance participants officially recognized after the war was "about 2% of the adult French population [or about 400,000]." H e goes on to say that "there was no doubt, wider complicities, but even if one adds those willing to read underground newspapers, some two million persons, or around 10% of the adult population, seem to have been willing to take that risk."[7] However, h istorian John Sweets argues that while "a definition that is limited to active members of organized groups has the advantage of greater precision, such a limitation may prohibit an adequate appreciation of the phenomenon of resistance." Sweets maintains that "the existence of an extensive network of sympathizers and accomplices beyond the framework of the organized resistance has sometimes been overlooked or underestimated in scholarly accounts of the Vichy period."[8]

Further complications in interpreting Resistance activity have emerged with a drive by feminist historians to redefine "Resistance" in a more inclusive way, that is, to make it encompass spontaneous and individual activities, liaison work, clandestine pub lishing and other work undertaken by women. The goal of feminist historians is to ensure that women's role in the Resistance will be given proper historical credit. Women's activities have been, until recently, largely excluded from mainstream press cov erage and, by extension, from history books.[9] This exclusion may, in part, be due to the fact that the image of women's clandestine roles as extensions of traditional female responsibilities tended to 'normalize' their actions and to 'domesticate' thei r political implications, in the eyes of both postwar chroniclers of the Resistance, and the women themselves.[10]

However, one publication, Femmes Franáaises, the Communist weekly newspaper of the Union Des Femmes Franáaises (U.F.F.),[11] was an exception because it attempted to help women overcome this image. Femmes Franáaises was published on a weekly basis starting in 1945. Amidst its recipes for embellishing rutabagas and the patterns for making children's shoes, there was a considerable amount of information about the roles women played in the Resistance, and in the immediate post-war soci ety. During the war, the paper informed women on ways to resist the occupation more effectively in their lives, and after the war, it attempted to sustain the advances women had made during the devastating conflict. Newspapers like the Femmes Franáaises are an invaluable resource for a feminist historian, because they offer a forum that acknowledged women, events and attitudes that might otherwise have been irretrievable. In 1975, the U.F.F. also sponsored and published the proceedings of a colloquium on women in the Resistance. The paper made available to the p ublic first-hand accounts of women's' lives in the Resistance, although following a significant lag of thirty years.

The challenge in examining the diversity of women involved in the Resistance is that the range of their activities were so varied, they almost defy classification. The base of support was very wide, as historian Rayna Kline notes: "The popular movements evolved not only out of ideological, religious and patriotic convictions, but also out of the realities of daily routine."[12] An analysis of the political aspects helps to clarify the extent to which women were immersed in the Resistance from the outse t, and to what extent the radicalizing effect of wartime would influence their status in the immediate post-war period.

Resistance was originally "spontaneous, instinctive, and individual; in this immediate reaction women were without a doubt more numerous than men."[13] Eventually, it became more organized. Women began to demonstrate, regardless of their ideological com mitment, mainly for economic reasons. They had very practical concerns: shortages of milk, oil, coal, children's' shoes, cloth diapers, etc. As many husbands were away, fighting or working in labor camps, women were faced with obligations for which the y were not prepared: to work and to care for the children in the Draconian climate during the occupation. In addition to the double shift of home and work, women had to wait in long lines, and live on a scarcity of ration coupons. These discontented wo men, according to one Résistante, "harbored a potential opposition to the Nazi occupant and to its servants."[14]

In order to harness this potential, politically active women formed committees of all sorts to organize non-active women (housewives, mothers, prisoners' wives) to resist, "to prevent their surrender to resignation, to prevent them from accepting the 'fat ality' of this situation."[15] It became crucial to develop lines of communication and "comités de ménagäres" ("housewife committees") in order to keep women informed, to find shelter for illegal friends, and to keep spirits up. As a result, many women became involved in clandestine propaganda. They started with leaflets written by hand, manifolds from carbon paper, and finally, modest newspapers printed on children's printing presses.[16] While some were crudely executed, they were an effective means of conveying the message to resist.

For example, in La Femme d'Eure et Loir (the "Journal of Patriotic Women" from the department of Eure et Loir) dated 20 September 1943, the message was straightforward:

We women, deprived of everything, must raise our voices, unite ourselves by district, between our co-workers at the factory, to set up committees of union and action. Let's go to the town hall and to the police station with our children to m ake them see the holes in their shoes, their pinafores in tatters, their coats too small. Let's go, women! Rise up![17]

Similarly, the Popular Committee of the Women of Marseilles distributed a notice entitled "Ménagäres, Mamans Marseillaises" (Housewives and Mothers of Marseilles):

We are concerned with: Hunger, epidemics of diarrhea and typhoid, long lines, closed bakeries, while these fat men of Vichy eat their four meals a day from the black market. We demand: Bread (without waiting in line), butter and oil, pasta, potatoes, f ruit, milk (to which our children have a right). Women of Marseilles: Isolated we can do nothing, united we will be stronger and able to act. Let's form popular committees. Redistribute this list of claims! Show up at the prefecture to better repleni sh our stores! Down with the Vichy starvers! Long live free and independent France![18]

The clandestine first edition of Femmes Franáaises, published in January 1944, set an important precedent for subsequent editions by appealing not only to very practical concerns, but to intellectual and spiritual ones as well. The heading was "Ou r Daily Tasks", and the article describes these Resistance activities in great detail:

In the home, for example, if your husband or father [was] doing permanent Resistance activity, [you had to] be sure to destroy documents no longer useful or valid, [you could not] keep names and addresses of your friends, and when you [did] have to keep a document, [you had to] disguise it effectively.[19]

At the same time, the article addressed the need for women to create an atmosphere of courage and of confidence, not of defeatism.

Similarly, when out shopping, socializing or working, women were encouraged to make sure to make that other women were conscious of the miseries the Vichy had brought to France; to make sure that everyone knew that while they arduously searched for 180 gr ams of cheese for the month, the Germans were exporting tons of gruyere to feed their families.[20] Also, for women who worked in factories, there was a detailed account of how to sabotage the machinery and how to create in the workplace an atmosphere ho stile to the Nazis. The article ended with the motto, "Be ingenious so that you return home at night with a tranquil conscience because you have done your daily sabotage."[21]

Through involvement in more organized Resistance activity, many women became politicized, and those were not just the ones who were ideologically committed before the war, but also those "passive" women to whom the tracts were distributed. Emilienne Gali cier-Lallemand, elected to the Constituent Assembly in 1945, put it succinctly while speaking of the participation of women in the resistance: "All this work, this becoming conscious of the role that they could play in the outcome, led women to particip ate more intensively in political life... they became aware of the immense role they could play."

There is no doubt that the war had radical consequences. The women who were politically active before the war became even more militant during the war, whereas women who were apolitical, became involved in politics in ways they would not have before the war. In addition, there were many cases of commitments to Communist and /or anti-Fascist beliefs carrying over after the war. Some of these women stand out as compelling examples of fortitude in the face of hardship and despair. How they motivated themselves and others around them, and how they continued their struggle afte r the war, deserves to be studied.

The first of these was Marie-Claude Vaillant-Couturier, a reporter and photographer born in Paris in 1912. She was deported to Auschwitz in January of 1942 for her Resistance work, then sent to Ravensbruck.[22] After the war, she returned to France to b ecome a member of the Constituent Assemblies in 1945-1946 and the Vice President of the National Assembly in 1956-1958. She was a witness at the Nuremberg war crimes trials, and was also decorated with the Chevalier de la Legion d'Honneur. She was remar kable because she continued her Resistance work inside the death camps, and at the time of liberation, refused to return to France as long as there were sick people to care for, indicating her fervent desire not only to help other women but also to contin ue her fight against fascism.

The goal of the resistance movement that she helped organize at Auschwitz was to somehow remain human beings and survive through moral and material help, while at the same time maintaining confidence in an eventual Allied victory. Her efforts included tr ying to furnish clothes and shoes, food supplements to the weakest and medicine to the sickest. She and her supporters also attempted to place the ill and wounded in the least difficult work posts. She also attempted to save an invalid from exterminatio n by hiding her and substituting her number for that of a dead person.[23]

Vaillant-Couturier also worked on the information network in the camp, because she understood that "news for the prisoners was as important as bread."[24] As an indication of the degree to which the prisoners were able to communicate with one another, an alliance was maintained with the men's camp, with whom measures were taken "to participate in a collective escape or in a revolt when the front was sufficiently close... because it was believed the SS would annihilate the camp."[25] Communication networ ks led to hands-on resistance. Some of these measures included the collection of wire cutters, shovels and pickaxes, as well as explosives, which were introduced secretly into the camp by the women who worked at the grenade factory.

According to Vaillant-Couturier, a change in circumstances after six months at Auschwitz played a great part in her survival. She and the fifty-one Frenchwomen remaining from an original convoy of 230 were put in quarantine from typhus for ten months, an d were then transferred to Ravensbruck - more a "labor" camp than an "extermination" camp. They were thus spared the almost certain death awaiting them at Auschwitz, because responding to an intensive campaign carried out by the BBC in London, "orders ha d been issued from Berlin to the effect that French women should be transported under better conditions." This campaign was in connection with four women in particular in the convoy, including Vaillant-Couturier.[26]

When Vaillant-Couturier was moved to the women's camp at Ravensbruck, she found no "paramilitary organization and the structure of the Resistance was more blurred," made up more by personal contacts. The proportion of political prisoners was much higher at Ravensbruck than at Auschwitz, resulting in "an atmosphere more conscio us of the [anti-Fascist] struggle."[27] Their constant preoccupation was to keep the Nazis from profiting from their labor, which was especially important because Ravensbruck produced goods of utmost importance to the Germans. Ravensbruck was considered to be a clearing camp to furnish slave labor for industry all across Germany. The Frenchwomen were not a completely unified group of resisters, but on one issue they were united: They would take every possible means to not help the Nazis, to avoid work, to slow production down, to sabotage the machinery.

The international solidarity demonstrated at Ravensbruck was evident through the actions of an international liaison group, of which the French Resister Martha Desrumeaux was a member. There were several incidents Vaillant-Couturier pointed out worth me ntioning, because they show how resistance cut across political and national frontiers:

At Ravensbruck in 1945, in order to disguise and save three Austrian Communist women who were condemned to death, we needed the help of comrades from several countries which had absolutely opposite political opinions to ours. Likewise, when in February 1 945 we learned that the Polish women the SS doctors had used as guinea pigs were going to be sent off in an extermination transport, we needed to save them the complicity of the French N. N. ('Nacht und Nebel', or 'the Secret Block'), and girls from the S oviet army living in the same block, and also the complicity of numerous others in order to permit their survival until the Red Cross evacuation.[28]

This international cooperation, in the eyes of Vaillant-Couturier, was one of the biggest victories in the camp because it was carried off despite the fact the Nazis tried to use national prejudices to tempt ("not without success at first") the prisoners of one country to rise up against those of another.

Vaillant-Couturier seemed to know instinctively that good morale was the most important factor in her group's survival and from the beginning tried to raise spirits. After hearing about a whole transport from Holland that had not survived, she reflected that because "they had bad morale, they hadn't fought back. We [were] political prisoners, we [would not] let ourselves be brought down."[29]

Vaillant-Couturier discussed the Fascist method of oppression with great insight because she had not only experienced it, but had also offered great resistance to it:

The system employed by the Nazi SS of degrading human beings to the utmost by terrorizing them, and causing them through fear to commit acts which made them ashamed of themselves, resulted in their being no longer human. This was what they wanted. It to ok a great deal of courage to resist this atmosphere of terror and corruption.[30]

According to Vaillant-Couturier, to have the ability to resist in this atmosphere, where everything was in place to transform humans into brutes, it was necessary to have an ideal dearer than life. She described her struggle against demoralization, even in those most difficult conditions, saying that the most important thin g was to "create an atmosphere of moral and material solidarity; to create an organization which gave the impression to each that she was not alone, that others shared her suffering, and this made the burden less heavy."[31]

Vaillant-Couturier showed her truly heroic nature through her constant striving to overcome apathy, the risking of her life to care for sick companions and the hiding of those the SS wanted to send to death. In his book, Man's Search for Meaning, Viktor Frankl wrote, "the experiences of camp life show[ed] that [wo]man [did] have a choice of action... [she could] preserve a vestige of spiritual freedom, of independence of mind, even in such terrible conditions of psychic and physical stress..." He discus sed people like Vaillant-Couturier:

Those who walked through the huts comforting others, giving away their last piece of bread. They may have been few in number, but they offer[ed.] sufficient proof that everything [could] be taken from a [wo]man but one thing: the last of the human freed oms - to choose one's attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one's own way.[32]

Vaillant-Couturier's articles showed that her commitment to anti-Fascist beliefs was the ideal she held more dearly than life itself. While it is unclear what her political affiliation was before the war, Vaillant-Couturier showed a very strong commitment after the war to the Communist Party. She had a long career in politic s, where she was elected Deputy of the Seine from 1946-1958, Vice-President of the National Assembly from 1956-1958, Communist Deputy of the Seine in 1963, as well as being a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party.

In addition to her impressive political career, Vaillant-Couturier continued as a journalist and photographer to advance her ideals. As an example, in the 23 November 1946 edition of Femmes Franáaises, she issued an appeal to help the Spanish peop le fight fascism, saying the terrible repression in Spain was a threat to peace. She also wanted to call attention to the Nazi scientists who were making atomic bombs at Bilbao (near the Franco-Spanish border).[33] Another article she wrote credited the brave and heroic youth of the Resistance for their invaluable role, and discussed the issues which concerned her as a Communist: "The need to create sufficient apprenticeship centers to give young people a career, the need to open up the universities an d the Grands Ecoles to all those whose aptitudes permit it, and the need to make loans available to help young households establish themselves."[34]

Another committed Résistante was Madeleine Braun. Born in Paris in 1907, she first studied music, then law. She lived a sheltered life and had no political conviction. This changed quickly in 1930, when she was put in contact with the misery of people. She was placed in charge of setting up a national insurance servic e in a hospital and was challenged to help all the suffering patients. She decided that she would "never cease to exert herself in the struggle to ameliorate the lot of workers."[35] Braun's efforts against fascism began when presented with German refug ees fleeing persecution in 1933. She traveled briefly to Spain and Ethiopia; "everywhere there was misery to succor, to organize help and to concentrate energies."[36] She was appointed Secretary of the International Committee for Aid to Spain. She was also named as a member of the Front National Committee for the southern zone of France, where she became a liaison agent. This was a hazardous role[37] that many politicized women took up; a role so new that it had not yet been "gender-tagged"[38] and w as thus widely available to women. They acted as intermediaries for members of the Resistance, delivering documents, orders and weapons, coordinating work and coding reports.

Though she cursed the old bicycles on which they had to ride from one rendezvous to another, she emphasized:

Sadness or tension didn't reign among us. We were young, happy, we had humor and could make a book of droll anecdotes. We were clandestine, thus free as the air, and we wanted to stay free. We knew also why we were fighting. Many of us had anti-fascis t convictions... we weren't soldiers nor professional politicians, and there was in us a great purity of spirit, no compromising nor electoralism.[39]

Braun became a member of the provisional Consultative Assembly in 1944, was a Communist Deputy for the Seine from 1945-1951, and was the first woman elected to the post of Vice-President of the National Assembly in 1946. She, like Vaillant-Couturier, was decorated with the Chevalier de la Legion d'Honneur. She also directed one of the largest morning newspapers,[40] and was co-director of Editeurs Franáais Reunis. Speaking on the subject of women's advances since the war, she said:

In the action, in the Resistance, women jumped a big hurdle for their emancipation. They were not only made aware of their duties and their rights, but also gave to men another vision of the responsibilities that they were capable of assuming, and the Co nsultative Assembly of Algeria on 24 March 1944 finally gave them the right to vote (though it was not unanimous).[41]

Braun came out of the Resistance experience as a politician with, in her words, a "great purity of spirit", but did not continue in politics after 1951. Perhaps, she found too much compromising and electoralism in the political arena. She did continue, however, to promote her anti-Fascist and feminist convictions in her role as a journalist for Femmes Franáaises.

The story of Madeleine Marzin, a schoolteacher from a fishing village, who moved to Paris in the late 1930s, is an example of another woman who came out of World War II more political. She was taken up with human misery when she started teaching in the E ighteenth Arrondissement with a class of sixty backward, unbalanced, quasi abnormal children. She was angry with certain children in the class who always fell asleep until she discovered that they had been up since 5:00 AM taking care of their siblings, while their parents were scrounging for food in garbage cans. Realizing the injustice of this, she tried to get Social Assistance to help, but they would not venture into this zone, so she herself tried to resolve the problems posed by their destitution.

Marzin decided that "only in a group could one hope to conquer" so she joined the teachers' union, and this is where she became politically active. In 1940, the U.F.F. found her calling on teachers to unite and fight against the German occupation. In 19 42, after her arrest for distributing jars of jam, she was beaten and condemned to death by the Gestapo. She escaped from the transport, and though her photo was posted in every police station, she continued her struggle, going to Lorraine to organize wo men's resistance. She stayed there until December 1944, continuing to accomplish her liaison missions despite her poor health.

After the war Marzin continued her political work. She was elected Municipal Counselor of the Twentieth Arrondissement, even though she found herself dissatisfied and isolated because her role was "reduced to that of a social assistant." She said she mi ssed teaching because her role was now merely consultative, and she wanted to be a "true" municipal counselor, "to relieve as much misery and sadness as possible."[42]

Yvonne Dumont had been a member of the Communist Party in Rouen since 1935. From the beginning of the war, she worked as a schoolteacher, while working underground for the Party. She found hiding places for their printing presses, received and distribut ed equipment, and looked for hideouts for clandestine operatives. In the summer of 1941 - just before the Germans declared war on the USSR - she went underground herself when the Police Commissioner came looking for her at school.

Dumont stayed in the Rouen area for six months. At the start of the German Occupation she was busy making anti-Fascist inscriptions on the streets with chalk, and distributing tracts in the middle of the night. When this became too dangerous, in the opi nion of the Party, she was put to work organizing Women's Committees. Centered in Paris, she traveled all over the six departments she was responsible for, staying with "simple people... who knew quite well [the risk] they were exposing themselves to," y et still welcomed her in extraordinary ways, especially in the countryside where provisions were easier to come by. She once wrote, "When people had something, a rabbit for example, they saved it for the day when I was coming." In the cities it was more difficult to find a safe place to stay, as in Bordeaux in 1943: "The city was partitioned. There was terrible repression; provocateurs had succeeded in infiltrating the movement. This had created a terrible panic. It was oppressive. I succeeded in r enting a filthy room, without heat, almost without light."[43]

Dumont also spoke about her solitude as a clandestine agent, describing her bi-monthly two-day trips to Paris as follows:

During those two days, I had two or three meetings of fifteen minutes or half an hour. The rest of the time, I went to the cinema. When it was nice weather, I would go sit in the park. One found few interesting books... this is why it was so precious t o receive a warm welcome. These people who had an obscure role had an admirable role, because it is thanks to them that the Resistance could hold on.[44]

In June 1943, Dumont found out that she was pregnant, and by the sixth month her job became too dangerous. She went to Paris, yet continued some liaison work despite the risk. She gave birth in February 1944, without knowing what had happened to the fat her, who had been imprisoned in Bordeaux. She wanted to give her real name to the baby, but could not declare her identity, having entered the hospital as "Madame X". She worried though that if something were to happen to her, no one could recover her d aughter. She went to the City Hall of the Fourteenth Arrondissement with her own birth certificate and the birth papers of the child and declared the baby as hers, thus taking the risk of coming out of hiding for one hour. The next day she drove to the country to the parents of her daughter's father, where she learned he had been shot.

Dumont's commitment to her work was undeterred by the disturbing news. Before returning to Paris, she decided to leave her daughter with the grandparents, and was unable to see or hear news of her until September 1943. Leaving her very young baby for so long showed the extraordinary strength of her convictions. After the w ar, she continued her involvement in politics, becoming a Senator, the Vice-President of the U.F.F., and a representative of the Women's' International Democratic Federation for UNESCO.

Many women like Dumont were committed to fighting fascism before the war, and for some this process was accelerated by the proximity of the Spanish Civil War. Francine Escande, for example, was the daughter of a Prefect and the wife of a sub-Prefect, and even though she never wanted nor had the opportunity to become politically engaged, she was deeply anti-Fascist because her education conditioned her to be no other way. In the beginning of 1939, she and her husband arrived in the Pyrenees, where they c ame into contact with its victims, the Spanish refugees, and were made physically aware of fascism.

In Nice, Escande decided that the Nazi occupation was not acceptable so she joined the French Resistance. She claims that she was only like thousands of other women, helping her husband to do his work, thus her specific tasks were not distinguished. She , like others in this work, refused to accept the conditions of the German occupation. Escande was also like a multitude of other women who, in other circumstances, would never have become involved in such political activities. She was not one to pursue a political career after the war; instead, what she took from her experience was "tolerance of the ideas of others... the true sense of liberty".[45]

These various women had very different positions in the French Resistance Movement, yet they were all bound by their political experiences. What made them exceptional was a strong motivation to resist. One woman from Anduze wrote:

It was during this period of clandestinity that I learned to understand, to feel deeply that one could have differing philosophical, religious or political conceptions, and could nevertheless unite, help one another, even love one another, by having the s ame goal to pursue. It was during this period that I felt how much love of country, love of children or family, could unite women who appeared to never be able to understand one another.[46]

Their refusal to resign themselves to the "inevitable" forced them to make the transition from passivity to active protest, a radicalization that required them to risk their lives. These were women who were pushed to the extreme, so that they could ignit e in less politicized women a sense of urgency. Sometimes this incitation was effortless, sometimes not:

With some women, it was necessary to discuss a lot with them so they'd decide to act, for the return of prisoners, for supplies of food, but others were ready. One woman from the Bellevue quarter saw her son tortured in front of her, it was an atrocious memory. She understood that she could never do enough to chase out the occupant.[47]

The women considered in this work should not be taken as representative of all women in the Resistance, especially since the movement was popular amongst all classes, and only the middle and upper classes are presented here. Nevertheless, an examination of their experiences does illuminate a range of motivations and situations typical of many. It also gives a small glimpse into the discouragement many women seemed to feel in the post-war political situation.

While the war years for women were stressful, exhausting, and often times lonely, many felt at the same time a sense of excitement and courage in their new and independent roles. Some women saw the era immediately following the war as the right time for France to move toward a society of equal participation of all of its citizens, particularly with the acquisition of the right for women to vote. According to one Reésistante, Camille Tauber, the progression was spontaneous:

This audacity, courage and independence express[ed.] itself at the Liberation in the natural access to civic functions: Women became mayors, adjuncts, municipal counselors... as if they had always done this. They [brought] to these tasks the same obstin acy, the same desire to make a success of it as to their tasks of resistance.[48]

However, Tauber proved to be rather optimistic in assessing the ease with which women could glide into French politics. It did not take very long before French politics reverted to its pre-war attitudes that excluded women. Studies of French women in th e political process show that they did not retain their gains. Where in 1946 they represented 382 out of a total 2,801 candidates, by 1951 they had fallen to 191.[49] Thus, women's wartime political activities were not sustained after the war, except in the case of the French Communist Party, which through the U.F.F. provided a forum for women to continue their activism. The role of the U.F.F. may have significantly facilitated the successful political careers of women such as Vaillant-Couturier and Du mont. The lack of other such organizations for women may help to explain why women had short-lived and often unfulfilling experiences in the political arena. Lucie Aubrac cut right to the heart of the issue:

If, at the liberation, the assemblies included a significant number of women, that number diminished fast. The return to prewar political structures, the tedious games of a formal and often courtesan parliamentarianism and--why not--male atavism re-established in the old ways of thinking,...alienated women from na tional representation.
read more
0 comments

30 Years of Iranian Women´s Resistance


By Jila Kazerounian, WFAFI Executive Director
June 27, 2009

The American Chronicle

The images are very powerful. Iranian women, young and old, stand up to the fundamentalist, misogynist dictators of Tehran. No wonder that Neda Agha Soltan, the brave young woman who was brutally murdered by the Basij militia forces, has become the face and the symbol of this uprising. Iranian women identify with Neda, now a mystified figure, a martyr and an icon. They now have a face and a symbol for their struggle against misogyny. Today, Neda is a daughter and a sister to all Iranians from every walk of life inside and outside Iran.

Though the world is just hearing and seeing bits and pieces of it, the story of the struggle of Iranian women against dictatorship is not new. In the 1979 revolution against monarchy, women were present in masses at all demonstrations that eventually brought down the dictatorship of the Shah. They took part in the revolution with the hope of establishing democracy and freedom in their country. Their revolution was hijacked by Khomeini and his cronies whose viciousness and brutality has been unmatched in Iran´s history. A few months after the revolution, by Khomeini´s order, women were required to wear hejab (the "Islamic" dress code). Scores of them were forced out of work. The laws of the land morphed into Sharia law that basically considered women as second class citizens with minimal legal rights. Iranian women felt betrayed and found themselves under enormous suppression but they did not give up.

On June 20th, 1981 tens of thousands of women poured into the streets of Tehran alongside their brothers and male comrades to peacefully protest the clerical regime´s conduct in limiting their freedom, closing the media outlets, attacking the opposition and crushing the slightest whispers of dissent. Their peaceful demonstration was attacked the exact same way as we see on the streets toda, by bullets and batons. Thousands were arrested, among them teenage boys and girls. In the next two weeks, scores of them were executed without even revealing their names to the authorities. Their pictures were published in the state owned media the next day asking parents with missing children to go to the morgue and identify the bodies, and pay the cost of the bullets that killed their loved ones. On June 20th, 2009 the world witnessed in horror the violence and brutality of the ruling mullahs as a result of the internet, cell phones and social networking sites. 28 years prior to this day, the outside world hardly realized the cruelty and viciousness
against the generation of Neda´s parents.

Following that infamous day in 1981, the clerics and their cronies (Rafsanjani, Khatami and Mousavi among them) began a horrific campaign of terror against Iranian dissidents. Tens of thousand were imprisoned and executed. The mere distribution of an opposition pamphlet or newspaper could potentially result to one´s execution. Young virgin girls were routinely raped in the prisons before their execution so they would not end up in the heaven (according to the Sharia law, if one dies virgin she will go to heaven!) Pregnant women were shot in the abdomen and grandmothers were hanged in the prisons. The Iranian women´s heroic resistance was hardly heard or seen then. Those who stood up to the violence of the mullahs then were labeled terrorists by the Iranian regime and their western supporters. Their political activities limited and their hands tied as a show of goodwill to the mullahs.

Throughout the years, the brave women of Iranian resistance have stood up to the most brutal and vicious religious dictatorship of the 20th century. They have led the most organized opposition to the mullahs. Their resolve and resilience has shocked their enemies and heartened their friends. These women never gave up their quest for freedom. There was never a vacuum in the continuity of the struggle. While the western media chose to look for the woods behind a tree, organized resistance led by a woman, Maryam Rajavi empowered thousands of Iranian women to take leading roles in their strive for democracy and justice.

28 years after the mass peaceful demonstration of 1981, history repeats itself. Neda and her friends are an extension of those brave women who have throughout the years stood up to the mullahs and who have never given up. Neda´s struggle is the extension of the struggle of all those women who have defied the rule of tyranny and misogyny.
Let´s bow to Neda´s soul and to all who gave up their lives for freedom of their people. May they all rest in peace.
read more
0 comments

Excerpts : E-ZAN voice of women against fundamentalism


Since last month, the world community has witnessed, first hand, the bravery and courage of Iranian women defying Islamic fundamentalism. Media reported images of women organizing and joining others in the frontlines to push back the suppressive forces of the Iranian regime are countless. Of course, the price for liberation and freedom is high. Just like Neda Agaha-Soltan Salehi, other women like Parisa Koli and Fahimeh Salahshoor have been killed by regime's sharpshooters in the streets of Tehran and elsewhere. The misogynous regime in Tehran has given the sharpshooters specific directions to aim to kill women in the streets. Faced with the undying aspiration of an indigenous liberation movement, Khamenei and Ahmadinejad realize that their days are numbered.

The recent uprising in Iran marks a significant milestone in the forthcoming change of regime in Iran. Many, rightfully so, compare these days with the leading months to the 1979 revolution. A page has turned in Iran and some call it the "beginning of the end" of the system of vali-e-faqih (Supreme Leadership). There is no doubt that women will continue to play an active and leading role in coming months. They have the most to gain from a positive change in Iran.

To support them, the world community must speak in one voice to:

- Denounce the Iranian regime and its crimes against the Iranian people.

- Declare the criminal gang of Khamenei and Ahmadinejad illegitimate and illegal.

- Cut all diplomatic ties with the regime in Tehran

When the people of Iran are paying with their blood to rid the world community from such a dangerous regime, this is the minimum others can do in their support. Let us hope the leaders of the free world will listen and take the side of the Iranian people and not the criminal regime in Tehran.


Christian Science Monitor - June 15, 2009

What is striking about the Iranians protesting fraud in the June 10 "election" is the number of women on the front lines. Among all those cheated at the polls, they may feel the most denied. For the first time in one of the Islamic Republic's controlled presidential campaigns, the women's movement was able to raise its demands clearly and independently – even though the unelected, 12-member, all-male Guardian Council did not allow any female candidates to run. The movement's courage to confront the patriarchal theocracy (in which "morality police" still roam the streets looking for women with make-up) may have been a big reason why the regime rigged the vote count...Yet the ballot fraud was done with such audacity and clumsiness that the "landslide winner," President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, will likely find it difficult to rule. And the West should hesitate before cozying up to a regime with fading legitimacy and which so openly suppresses half its population and sees women as a security threat. What country would have faith in signing a deal with a regime that cheats its own people, especially women, at the ballot box?...Mr. Ahmadinejad has a strong record against women. He changed the name of the government's "Center for Women's Participation" to the "Center for Women and Family Affairs." He limited women's access to higher education and proposed laws that would allow men to divorce their wives without informing them and not to pay alimony. Most of all, the regime has jailed dozens of women involved in the One Million Signatures Campaign, a grass-roots movement that began in 2006 to reform the legal system and to end gender discrimination. The group has been harassed in their homes and branded as illegal. It is of little surprise, then, to see images of women, only slightly veiled, confronting the regime in post-election protests. While Ahmadinejad's false victory may have toughened the clerics' foreign posture with the West, they've only exposed their weakness at home.

The Associated Press - June 17, 2009

It's not just young, liberal rich kids anymore: Whole families, taxi drivers, even conservative women in black chadors are joining Iran's opposition street protests.The last time Iran was engulfed in similar anti-government action was a decade ago when a deadly raid on a Tehran University dorm sparked six days of nationwide protests. At the time, they were considered the worst since the 1979 revolution that toppled the pro-U.S. shah and brought hard-line clerics to power.A mother and her daughter, making their way through the crowd of thousands, said they had come because they could not sit at home anymore and watch what was happening. "This is completely different to 1999. That was between the students and the government. This is between the people and the government. This time it is all of Iran. This is a historic movement," Boorghani said."The government may try to strangle us, but we won't sit back and let them," Boorghani said. "There's no way back. We won't give up."

CNN - June 19, 2009

Like thousands of other Iranian women, Parisa took to Tehran's streets this week, her heart brimming with hope. "Change," said the placards around her. The young Iranian woman eyed the crowd and pondered the possibility that the rest of her life might be different from her mother's. She could see glimmers of a future free from discrimination -- and all the symbols of it, including the head-covering the government requires her to wear every day. Women, regarded as second-class citizens under Iranian law, have been noticeably front and center of the massive demonstrations that have unfolded since the presidential election a week ago. Iranians are protesting what they consider a fraudulent vote count favoring hardline incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, but for many women like Parisa, the demonstrations are just as much about taking Iran one step closer to democracy. "This regime is against all humanity, more specifically against all women," said Parisa, whom CNN is not fully identifying for security reasons. "I see lots of girls and women in these demonstrations," she said. "They are all angry, ready to explode, scream out and let the world hear their voice. I want the world to know that as a woman in this country, I have no freedom." "Today, we were wearing black," Parisa said, referring to the day of mourning to remember those who have died in post-election violence."We were holding signs. We said, 'We are not sheep. We are human beings,'" she said. Parisa was thankful for all the images being transmitted out of Iran despite the government's crackdown on international journalists. She was thankful, too, that the world cared. "Today," she said, "I had this feeling of hope that things will finally change."

The New York Times - June 20, 2009

I also know that Iran’s women stand in the vanguard. For days now, I’ve seen them urging less courageous men on. I’ve seen them get beaten and return to the fray. “Why are you sitting there?” one shouted at a couple of men perched on the sidewalk on Saturday. “Get up! Get up!” Another green-eyed woman, Mahin, aged 52, staggered into an alley clutching her face and in tears. Then, against the urging of those around her, she limped back into the crowd moving west toward Freedom Square. Cries of “Death to the dictator!” and “We want liberty!” accompanied her. There were people of all ages. I saw an old man on crutches, middle-aged office workers and bands of teenagers. Unlike the student revolts of 2003 and 1999, this movement is broad. “Can’t the United Nations help us?” one woman asked me. I said I doubted that very much. “So,” she said, “we are on our own.” Later, as night fell over the tumultuous capital, gunfire could be heard in the distance. And from rooftops across the city, the defiant sound of “Allah-u-Akbar” — “God is Great” — went up yet again, as it has every night since the fraudulent election. But on Saturday it seemed stronger. The same cry was heard in 1979, only for one form of absolutism to yield to another. Iran has waited long enough to be free.

The Associated Press - June 25, 2009

For years, women's defiance in Iran came in carefully planned flashes of hair under their head scarves, in brightly painted fingernails, and in trendy clothing that could be glimpsed under bulky coats and cloaks. But these small acts of rebellion against the theocratic government have been quickly eclipsed in the wake of the disputed June 12 presidential elections. In their place came images of Iranian women marching alongside men, of their scuffles with burly militiamen, of the sobering footage of a young woman named Neda, blood pouring from her mouth and nose minutes after she was fatally shot. In a part of the Muslim world where women are often repressed, these images have catapulted female demonstrators to the forefront of Iran's opposition movement. It is a role, say Iranian women and experts, that few seem willing to give up, and one that is likely to present even greater challenges to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's hard-line government in the wake of the recent violence and protests. "Iranian women are very powerful, and they want their freedom," said one woman in Tehran who said she had been taking part in the protests. Like all women in Iran interviewed for this story, she did not want to be named, fearing government retribution. But, she said, "they're really, really repressed, and they need to talk about it." The election seemed to open the floodgates for airing that sense of frustration. While Iranian women have been politically active in the past, coming out in large numbers in support of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the latest demonstrations showed them standing shoulder-to-shoulder with their male counterparts, enduring the same blows and threats. "We were all together, and we helped each other despite our sexuality, and we will be together," said a Tehran woman, 34, who is active in the protests.

Statesman Journal - July 1, 2009
Every revolution needs a unifying symbol, and members of Iran's opposition movement now have theirs...The thought is inescapable that the beautiful Neda Agha Soltan might have been selected from the crowd not to scare away protesters, but to unite them. It is not impossible to imagine that someone had a greater purpose in mind for the young philosophy student...What follows next is by no means predictable, but history provides hints. Neda's anointment as a martyr could become crucial in the next month. Followers of the Shiite branch of Islam participate in cycles of mourning — on the third, seventh and 40th days after death. These cycles served as rallying points during the 1979 revolution and conceivably could serve the same purpose now. In the meantime, it is reasonable to ask why Neda so captured the imagination when many others have died since the June 12 election. On the same day that Neda died, at least nine other protesters were killed...But as the days unfold, it will be interesting to watch how Neda, whose name means "The Voice" or "The Calling," is incorporated into the developing narrative of Iran and especially of Iranian women...That message may have been the sniper's target. With his bullet, he delivered another: Women either will behave and follow the rules, or they will die. Whatever the shooter's true aim, the body he left in the street has become immortal in the story of Iran. Neda — the voice of freedom — can never be silenced now.

NCRI Website - July 9, 2009

According to reports from inside Iran by the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) Social Headquarters, in the course of the July 9 uprising in Tehran, a large number of young women were arrested. They were taken to undisclosed locations and their fate remains unknown. Plain-clothes agents beat young women with batons and used pepper sprays, which could cause serious harm to their eyes, during the arrests. The agents then transferred the detainees in vans with license plates. Separately, underscoring the intensity of July 9 protests, at 23:00 local time, people in Aryashahr chanted, “We are men and women of war, Fight and we will fight back.” People also went to their rooftops immediately after the protests to chant “God is great” and “Death to dictator.”

Time Magazine - July 9, 2009


Nearly two weeks of silence on the streets of Tehran were broken in the evening of July 9 when thousands marched through the central districts of the Iranian capital to protest the June 12 presidential election. Another anniversary helped precipitate the show of apparent defiance: the 10th anniversary of a bloody student uprising that was brutally put down by the government. Despite threats earlier in the day of a "crushing" response, men, women and even some children went onto the streets with chants of "Death to the dictator"...But the response was indeed crushing. Members of the élite Revolutionary Guard and the dreaded paramilitary group the Basij rushed the initial crowd gathered at Enqelab (Revolution) Square with batons at around 5 p.m. One woman who was fleeing the scene had bloodstains on her white skirt splattered from demonstrators nearby. But pockets of protesters numbering in the hundreds soon resurfaced along many of the main streets north and east of Enqelab Square and in the city's main squares. For a few hours, the energy of the crowds seemed infinite, undiminished by the baton-wielding Basij zipping by on motorbikes. One student stood resolutely on the sidewalk of Fatemi Street and said, "We will not give up. First, Ahmadinejad. Then Khamenei. Then freedom."For the most part, the crowd remained nonviolent, though at one point young men began to throw rocks from an alley at passing soldiers. When the small group of soldiers retreated, the man in front of the protesters threw up his hands in victory to the cheers of the crowd. As a procession of men carrying flower arrangements commemorating the 1999 student uprising went by, a bystander explained that these men were the first to be attacked.

NCRI Website - July 15, 2009


Nearly one month after suppressive forces arrested Ms. Taraneh Mousavi, 28, there is still no information about her fate and whereabouts. She was arrested by suppressive forces on June 17 in Shari’ati Street in Tehran during the Iranian people’s nationwide uprising. Her mother was informed recently that Taraneh was undergoing treatment in Khomeini Hospital in Karaj, but when her mother went to the hospital, officials told her that they had no record of her there. According to eye-witness reports, Taraneh and a group of other people were arrested and taken by plainclothes agents to a secret torture site known as a “safe-house”. All those arrested with her were later transferred to Evin Prison, but no one has been able to confirm if she had been transferred from that center or removed from the custody of the plainclothes agents. Detainees of the uprising, in particular women and girls, are facing physical and psychological torture and even rape by plainclothes agents who are under the direct command of the office of the regime’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. In addition to Taraneh, there is no word on the fate of many other detained women and girls. At least 14 women and girls were among those arrested during protests on July 9, and their relatives have no information about them. (There is a list available with their names) Ms. Sarvnaz Chitsaz, Chair of the Women’s Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, urged Ms. Navanethem Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and Dr. Yakin Ertürk, the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women, to look into the cases of the detained women and girls, in particular Taraneh Mousavi. She calls on the UN Security Council to take urgent action against the brutal suppression of the detainees, especially the women.
read more
0 comments

Iranian women take key role in protests

By Emily Bazar, USA TODAY

Negar Mortazavi, who lives in Washington, D.C., stays in touch with Iranian friends who have been protesting in Tehran. On Saturday, a male student described on the phone violent clashes between protesters, police and plainclothes militia.

One scene stood out, and "he couldn't believe his eyes," said Mortazavi, 27, who came to the USA from Iran in 2002 and is helping to coordinate protests in the United States. "He decided it was time to start running when the police were coming. He turned back and saw some women still standing," she says. "These women are not afraid."

Iranian women have been on the front lines of anti-government protests challenging the official results of the June 12 election, in which President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was declared the victor.

MORE: Video turns woman into icon of Iran unrest

The face of a woman has become the symbol of the opposition. Music student Neda Agha Soltan, 27, was captured on video dying of a gunshot wound. The unsettling scene was transmitted around the world, and even President Obama referred to it this week.
FIND MORE STORIES IN: Barack Obama | Massachusetts | Iran | Mahmoud Ahmadinejad | Mir-Hossein Mousavi | Council on Foreign Relations | Zahra Rahnavard | Fatima Zahra

Political protest is not new to Iranian women. Yet, the extent of their activism in this election is unprecedented in the years since the 1979 revolution overthrew the U.S.-backed shah and created an Islamic regime, some Iranians and Iran experts say.

They cite several factors, including a growing population of young women who are hungry for social freedoms, the participation of prominent women during the campaign and promises by opposition candidates for advances in women's rights.

On Wednesday, the wife of the main opposition candidate, Mir Hossein Mousavi, continued to speak out. Zahra Rahnavard said on one of her husband's websites that arrested protesters and activists should be released, the Associated Press reported.

She added that government should not act "as if martial law has been imposed on the streets."

Rahnavard is an academic, writer and artist who campaigned alongside her husband. "She was saying women are equal to men, that they need opportunities to participate," said Dokhi Fassihian, a board member of the National Iranian American Council.

Rahnavard's campaigning inspired Iranian women to get active and vote, she said.

"They are maybe even more active than the men are," Fassihian said. "They have the most to gain from changes, from seeing a new government in Iran."

Isobel Coleman, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said she is "not surprised at all" by the level of participation among Iranian women. Coleman is author of the forthcoming book Paradise Beneath Her Feet: Women and Reform in the Middle East.

Iranian women can drive, vote, own businesses, attend and teach college and hold political office, among other things.

At the same time, they have fewer rights than men in family and criminal law, Coleman said. Iranian women are also required to observe Islamic dress, but how they comply ranges from the head-to-toe covering known as the chador to a strip of fabric covering some of their hair.

"What you're seeing boiling to the surface right now is the unbearable weight of contradiction for women in Iranian society," Coleman said.

In 2006, Iranian female activists started the "One Million Signatures Campaign," an ongoing effort to change laws that discriminate against women.

Ahmad Iravani, an Iranian ayatollah who teaches Islamic law at Catholic University of America in Washington, said Iranian women "have always been in front of any kind of protest ... especially when they feel, right or wrong, that injustice is going on."

The desire for gender equality has grown as satellite dishes, the Internet and other technologies have allowed Iranians easier access to the outside world, he said, especially among the large youthful population in a country where the median age is 27.

Fatemeh Haghighatjoo served in the Iranian parliament from 2000 to 2004. She and her colleagues passed a law to join an international convention calling for an end to discrimination against women, she said, but the law was vetoed by the country's powerful Guardian Council, an unelected body of clerics.

Haghighatjoo, who resigned from the parliament to protest a government crackdown on activists, came to the USA in 2005 and is a visiting scholar at the University of Massachusetts-Boston.

She agreed that Iranian women have been particularly active in this campaign, and believes they were energized by promises from some candidates for more gender equality. "They're fighting at this very moment to create a better future for their children," she said. "I am hopeful."
read more